


On the contrary: since a majority of works is done according to “the” rules (even when the rules were not applied a very relevant way…), it will necessarily make a strong effect of contrast if an artwork chooses to radically break the rules and contradict them all. So, for sure we can get to know much about the rules, principles and tricks of storytelling, but that does not mean that we have to apply them systematically and always a standard way. But nobody is allowed to say that artworks HAVE TO be done a certain way.

Why, who has quite Christian blood? We have no element to understand. “your eyes, sad eyes”: again, we have no other element to identify this “you”: is it us, or who else? The reduction of this character to his/her/their eyes stays in the overall logic of destruction. Again, the verb carries a negative meaning: to crawl, the weak form of walking like lisping is the weak form of talking. It also contributes to an aesthetic that refuses order, narration and meaning.Īgain, the subject is missing and the verb sounds vague – infinitive, available for action but not currently involved (“only crawl” sounds abstract compared to “I only crawl”). Surprisingly, the verbs of action are either deleted or weakened or turned indirect ways: a passive present continuous or a weird past time. The “I” is back, but just to assert 3 negative things on oneself, 2 about dying, 1 about a speech impediment – which for a singer/songwriter, sounds ironic, but very symbolic of Crystal Castles’ style. Same problem of meaning: the audience can not make sure about what is this “it”: the scars, or something else that remains unnamed? But the structure of the track stays surprising, it does not sound like a classic Verse/Chorus/Verse. This line breaks the systematic jumps of meaning and keeps continuous with the previous line, but not for a better result, since it just contradicts and cancels it.

Nobody can tell who is the “you” and what is the “it” in “you shrug it off” the “it” could mean the previous “scars”, but we can not be sure. The meaning jumps again for the third time in three lines. The voice totally changed: it became aggressive like the music.Ī medical-sounding line, after the “Hi”, creates a weird effect of contrast. A setup, the beginning of a conversation? It soon becomes clear that this “Hi” goes with nothing else and is a kind of wrong track – just meant to establish a fake cordiality just before passing on the attack. The track starts on layer of 8-bit glitches accompanied by some powerful, aggressive beats.Ī nice woman’s voice saying hello… in strong contrast with the violent music. The following area is only for review, if you want to submit the lyrics or the corrections of the lyrics, please click the link at the end of Year Of Silence Lyrics.Crystal Castles – Alice Practice – Lyrics analysis, interpretation and meaning Please Click Here to Print Year Of Silence Lyrics Please Click here to submit the Corrections of Year Of Silence Lyrics Crystal Castles - Year Of Silence (text piesne)ĭocument.write(' Send ' + (rm_song != '' & rm_artist != '' ? ''' + rm_song + '' Ringtone' : (rm_artist != '' ? rm_artist + ' Ringtones' : 'Ringtones')) + ' to your Cell ')
